Journal of Media Studies, Vol 31, No 1 (2016)

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large

Hate speech or healthy speech, user friendly or user anxiety: An analysis of cyber world speech discourse

Rukhsana Tariq

Abstract


This study explores the extent to which particular cyber forumsenable and provoke either hatred or healthy speech regarding socialand political issues from 2013 to 2014 and then the public'sresponse(s) to such discussions in Pakistan. The article originatesfrom a study conducted on 'hate speech', a study of Pakistan'scyberspace 2014, by bytesforall.pk, a social forum developingprofessional and healthy activities among users. The assessment ofthe democratic and autocratic potential of cyber world media helpsto understand cyber world as public sphere. By analyzing the extentto which specific forums within the internet sphere play a pivotalrole in facilitating emotions, developing anxiety and creating hatredwill help to propose regulations for cyber world. The paper alsodiscusses the impact of individual narrative and personalperspective and its role in developing negative and positive space.It is an attempt to present a holistic account of how we mightenvision playing a beneficial role among cyber world users.

References


Belli, S. , Harré, R. , & Íniguez-Rueda, L. (2010). What is love?Discourse about emotions in social Sciences. Human Affairs,20, 249-270.Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative.Great Britain. de la investigación actual, 39(2), 139-151.Campbell, N. (2005). Getting to the heart of the matter: Speech asthe Expression of Affect; Rather than just text or language.Language Resources and Evaluation, 39.Choucri. Madnick, & Ferwerda. (2014). Institutions for CyberSecurity: International Responses and Global Imperatives.Feigenbaum, Lee. , Ivan, Herman. , Tonya, Hongsermeier., Eric,Neumann., & Susie, Stephens. (2007). Semantic Web inAction. Scientific American, 297, 90-97.Gibbs, R. W. J. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science.: CambridgeUniversity Press.Habermas, Jurgen. (2006). Towards a United States of Europe.http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/poor.ht Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in theworld of modern science. New York: Routledge.Hollinger, V. (2000). Cyborgs and citadels/between monsters,goddess, and cyborgs. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture &Society, 25, 577-601.James, P., & Carkeek, F. (1997). Techno-disembodiment. Virtual politics:Identity and community in cyberspace. London: Springer.Leeke, C. M. (2013). Digital Sisiterhood. A Memoir of Fierce LivingOnline. Printed online.Tim, Reilly. O. (2005). What is Web 2.0:Designs pattern and BusinessModels for the Next Generation of Software.

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Institute of Communication Studies
University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore - 54590, Pakistan.

E-Mail : ed.jms.ics@gmail.com

Phone No. : 92-42-99231225