Facebook Usage Styles and Associated Socio-Psychological Apprehensions: A Gender Based Study
Abstract
Social media brought revolutionary changes in human communication behaviour. Social media has turned information seeking into a two-way process. The users can not only get information through social media but they can also share information. Therefore, social media changed the way users seek information and changed their communication behavior. The study aims to examine usage styles of Facebook and associated socio-psychological apprehensions. The study utilized a survey method for collection of data. The results show that unwanted contents, privacy concerns, distraction from family life, addiction to the site, frustration and hyper tension are found to be the risks associated with Facebook usage. However, no significant gender differences are noted regarding the stated concerns. Nonetheless, significant gender differences with respect to Facebook usage styles are found to exist by the previous researchers.
References
Abdulahi, A, Samadi, B. & Gharleghi, B. (2014). A Study on the Negative Effects of Social Networking Sites Such as Facebook Among Asia Pacific University Scholars in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 5, No. 10.Aghazamani, A. (2010). How do University Students Spend Their Time on Facebook? An Exploratory Study. Journal of American Science, 6, 730-735.Ahn, J. (2011). The Effect of Social Network Sites on Adolescents ‘Social and Academic Development: Current Theories and Controversies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1435–1445.Australian Psychological Society. (2010). The Social and Psychological Impact of Online Social Networking.Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedoms. London: New Haven.Yale University Press.Berkman, (2008). Enhancing Safety and Online Technologies. Final Report of the Internet Safety Task Force, Harvard Law School; USA. Internet Safety Technical Task; Retrieved on May 30, 2011 from website: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/ISTTF_Final_Report.pdfBlumenfeld, W.J. & Cooper, R.M. (2010). LGBT and Allied Youth Responses to Cyberbullying: Policy Implications. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(1), 114-133.Boyd, D. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth heart social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media., The John D. and Catherine T., MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. (pp. 119-142). USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.Boyar, R., Levine, D., & Zensius, N. (2011). Tech Sex USA: Youth Sexuality and Reproductive Health in the Digital Age. Retrieved on May 30, 2011 from ISIS website: http://www.isis-inc.org/ISISpaper_techsx_usa.pdf.Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail and Learning 2.0. Educase Review, 43 (1), 28-38.Christofides, E. Muise, A. & Desmarais, S. (2010). Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook: Youth and Adults’ Information Disclosure and Perceptions of Privacy Risks. Office of the Privacy Commissioner Canada, (21-38).Connolly, M. (2011). Benefits and Drawbacks of Social Media in Education. Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER), 22(4), 2.Dhaha, I. S. Y. & Igale, A. B. (2013). Facebook Usage among Somali Youth: A Test of Uses and gratification Approach. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 3(3).Facebook (2017). Key facts. Retrieved from: http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22.Hendrix, D., Chiarella, D., Hasman, L., Murphy, S., & Zacfron, M. L. (2009). Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97(1), 43-46.Kirschner, P. A. & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and Academic Performance. Computers and Human Behavior. 26: 1237-1245.Hartup, W.W. (1996). The Company They Keep: Friendships and Their Developmental Significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.Kowalski, R.N. (2010). Alexis Pilkington Facebook Horror: Cyber bullies harass even after suicide. Retrieved on June 3, 2011 from website: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/alexis-pilkington-faceboo_n_512482.htmlLenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, R. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant message generation and the internet’s impact on friendship and family relationships. Washington, USA: Pew internet and American Life Project URL:www.pewinternet.org. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf [June 19, 2007].Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, Privacy& Online Social Networks. Pew internet and American life project report. Pattern of Facebook Usage and its Impact on Academic Performance. 28.Lenhart A. (2007). Cyberbullying. Retrieved on June 3, 2011 from Pew Internet and American Life Project website; http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Cyberbullying.aspxLenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and young adults. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspxLivingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK Children Go Online: Final Report of Key Project Findings. ESRC and E- society.Media Awareness Network (2005). Young Canadians in a wired world: Phase II Student Survey. Research conducted by ERIN research, Media Awareness Network URL: http://www.mediaawareness.June 19, 2007.Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet and society: a preliminary report. IT & Society, 1(1), 275-283.Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn, and a small world. New Media & Society, 11(1), 199–220.Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., & Roberts, D.F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year Olds. Retrieved on May 15, 2011 from Kaiser Family Foundation website: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdfSafko, L. (2012). The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools & Strategies for Business Success. (3rd ed). New Jersey, USA: Wiley & Sons.Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, Gossip, Facebook, and MySpace. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 544-564.Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S. Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends' appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28-49.West, A., Lewis, J., & Currie, P. (2009). Students Facebook friends: public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 615-627.Zuckerberg, M. (November, 2011). Our commitment to the Facebook community. Retrieved from http://Blog.Facebook.Com/Blog.Php?.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.