Journal of Media Studies, Vol 31, No 2 (2016)

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large

Dynamics of political usage of smart phones: Examining relationship of exposure patterns and polarization among young voters

Muhammad Zahid, Muhammad Usman Saeed

Abstract


Mobile phones are credited to be the fastest penetrating technology among Pakistani youth. The study examines the role of selective exposure in polarization among young voters during General Elections of Pakistan, 2013. It highlights the relationship between usage of mobile phones for political messages and tendency of users to attend and share selective as well as diverse views and alternative perspectives. Findings from 200 respondents through survey method reveal that selective exposure of young voters is on decline and they engage themselves to diverse contents as well. Thus, polarization patterns of Pakistani youth are changing in relation to mobile usage.

References


An, J., Quercia, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2013). Fragmented socialmedia: a look into selective exposure to political news. Paperpresented at the Proceedings of the 22nd internationalconference on World Wide Web companion.Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2008). Mobile Communicationand the Public Sphere: Linking Patterns of Use to Civic andPolitical Engagement. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48104.Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L., & Sey, A.(2005). Electronic communication and socio-politicalmobilization: A new form of civil society. Global civil society,6, 266-285.DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American'ssocial attitudes become more polarized? American journal ofSociology, 102(3), 690-755.European Union Elections Observations Mission Pakistan.(2013). A Competitive and Improved Election Process inPakistan despite Militant Violence and ProceduralShortcomings. Islamabad: Retrieved fromhttp://www.eueom.eu/files/dmfile/eom-pakistanpreliminary-statement-13052013-en.pdf.Gallup Pakistan. (2013). The New Tide of Voter Turn-out:Report on Voter Turn-out in Pakistan’s National Election:2013. Retrieved fromhttp://gallup.com.pk/election/Report1.pdf.Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcementseeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal ofCommunication, 59(4), 676-699.Gilmore, J., & Howard, P. N. (2013). Does Social Media Makea Difference in Political Campaigns? Digital Dividends inBrazil's 2010 National Elections. Center for Communicationand Civic Engagement Working Paper(2013-2).Haiqing, Y. (2004). The power of thumbs: The politics of SMSin urban China. Graduate Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 2(2),30-43.Henning, J. (2014). Selective Exposure and Social Media:Discussion on Twitter During Political Events.http://juliaehenning.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/selective-exposure-and-social-media-e28094-discussion-ontwitter-during-political-events.pdfHimelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of afeather tweet together: Integrating network and contentanalyses to examine cross‐ ideology exposure on Twitter.Journal of Computer‐ Mediated Communication, 18(2), 40-60.Ibahrine, M. (2008). Mobile Communication andSociopolitical Change in the Arab World. Handbook ofmobile communication studies, 257.Johnson, T. J., Bichard, S. L., & Zhang, W. (2009).Communication Communities or “CyberGhettos?”: A PathAnalysis Model Examining Factors that Explain SelectiveExposure to Blogs1. Journal of Computer‐ MediatedCommunication, 15(1), 60-82.Kapucu, N. (2011). Social capital and civic engagement.International Journal of Social Inquiry, 4(1), 23-43.Klapper, J. (1960). The effects of mass communication.Glencoe: The Free Press.Merakou, A. (2013). The Selective Exposure HypothesisRevisited: Does Social Networking Make a Difference?http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/262829/AMerakou_3776964_Thesis.pdf?sequence=1Miard, F. (2012). Call for power? Mobile phones as facilitatorsof political activism. Cyberspaces and global affairs, 119-144.Muslim, I., Kamboh, M. K., Saleem, A., & Jameel, M. (2014).Diffusion of Political Communication through Text Messageson Mobile Phones. Educational Research International., 3(2),107-115.Pakistan Telecommunication Authority. (2013). AnnualReport 2013. Retrieved from www.pta.gov.pk.Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Politics and theTwitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationshipbetween political leaders and the public. UK: LexingtonBooks.Prete, M. I. (2007). M-politics: Credibility and effectiveness ofmobile political communications. Journal of Targeting,Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 16(1), 48-56.Rheingold, H. (2008). Mobile Media and Political CollectiveAction. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobilecommunication studies (pp. 225-239). Massachusetts: MITPress.Riaz, S. (2010). Effects of New Media Technologies onPolitical Communication. Journal of Political Studies, 1(2),161-173.Rothstein, B. (2003). Social capital, economic growth andquality of government: The causal mechanism. New PoliticalEconomy, 8(1), 49-71.Shakel, S. (2013, March 24). Pakistan’s Youth Buldge, TheExpress Tribune. Retrieved fromhttp://tribune.com.pk/story/525778/pakistans-youthbulge/Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selectiveexposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556-576.Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic. com 2.0. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Warner, B. R., & McKinney, M. S. (2013). To unite and divide:The polarizing effect of presidential debates. CommunicationStudies, 64(5), 508-527.

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Institute of Communication Studies
University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore - 54590, Pakistan.

E-Mail : ed.jms.ics@gmail.com

Phone No. : 92-42-99231225