Journal of Media Studies, Vol 29, No 2 (2014)

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large

Uses and gratifications of selected social network services: Study of Lahore youth

Mudassar Hussain, Tehseen Rubab

Abstract


The Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) havedrastically transformed the contemporary societies. Social NetworkingServices (SNS) have overcome time and space distance and increasedopportunities of individuals' interactions. This study explores theimpact of on students' behavior in Lahore. Utilized survey designwhere a self-administered questionnaire is the instrument to find outthe factors of these sites that had impact on respondents. Throughpurposive sampling 206 students are selected from two universities ofLahore. Data is analyzed in the backdrop of uses and gratificationstheory to determine 'most popular social networking site', 'timeconsumed on these sites', 'instrumental use or active use' and'ritualized use or passive use'. The descriptive statistics includingpercentage and mean is applied. The mean for ritualized or passive useof four items is 84% whereas for instrumental it is only 31%. The othersignificant statistics related to items include 63% use of Facebook, 61%use of the SNSs for more than two hours, 11% use for serious politicaldebate and 94% use for making fun of political personalities, 91% usefor sharing and liking the celebrity photos. This study also highlightsfuture considerations for research in this domain.

References


Abdullah, H. O. , Said, A., & Ibrahim, J. (2012). An Investigation intoPrivacy and Security in OSNS among IIUM students. World ofComputer Science and Information Technology Journal, 2(2),57-61.&Mital. (2009). Effects of SNSs on Trust Development andExtent of Communication. 74th Annual Convention, Organized byAssociation or Business Communication, Portsmouth, Virgina,Nov. 4-7, 2009.Aloufi, S. (2012). Trust-aware Link Prediction in Online SocialNetworks (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa).Arshad, J. (2010). Towards a Taxonomy of Privacy Concerns of OSNSs:A Case Study of Facebook Beacon (Master Thesis). Departmentof Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University/RoyalInstitute of Technology.Balsamo, A. (1995). Technologies of the Gendered Body: RedaingCyborg Women. New York: Duke University Press.Bode, L., Vrga, E. K., Borah, P. & Shah, D. V. (2013). A New Space forPolitical Behaviour: Political Social Networking and its DemocraticConsequences. Journal of Computer- MediatedCommunication. Volume 19(3).Boyd, D. & Ellison, N. (2007a). Social Networking Sites: Definition,history and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(2), 68-73.Boyd, D. (2007b). Why youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role ofNetworked Publics in Teenage Social Life, in D.Buckingham (ed) Youth, Identity and Digital MEDIA,Cambridge: MIT Press, pp.119-142.Cain, J. (2009). Pharmacy Students’ Facebook activity and Opinionsregarding accountability and E-professionalism. AmericanJournal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(6).Chung, D. S., & Kim, S. (2007). Blogging activity among cancer patientsand their companions: Uses, gratifications and predictos ofoutcomes, Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 297-306.Donath, J. (2007). Signals in Social Supernets. Jouranl of ComputerMediated Communication 13(1).Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of FacebookFriends: Social Capital and College Students’ use of OSNSs.Journal of Computer-Mediated communication, 12(4), 1143- 1168.Facebook. (2009). “Statistics.” Facebook.com.Faceook. (2012). Key facts.Ferguson, D. A. &Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as aFunctional Alternative to Television . Journal ofBroadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 155-174.Foregger, S. K. (2008). Uses and Gratifications of Facebook.com . PhDdissertation. Accesssed December, 20, 2014 from ProQuestdissertations and theses database.Greenhow, C. &Robelia, E. (2009). Informal Learning and IdentityFormation in OSNSs. Learning Media and Technology, 34(2),119-140.Heran, G. (1989). Active and Passive Conceptions of the TelevisionAudience: Effects of a Change in Viewing Routine. HumanRelations, 42, 857-75.Idid,S.A., Wok,S., Dhaha, I.S., & Ab. Aziz. Y. (2012). ContemporaryUses and Gratifications of Mobile Phone use among Youth:A Comparative Study. Paper presented at 21stAmic AnnualConference, 11-14 July, 2012 at Shah Alam, Malaysia.Katz, E., Blumler, J. &Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilizayion of MassCommunication by the Individual. In J. G. Blumbler& E. Kartz(Eds), The Uses of Mass Communication Current Perspectives onGratification Research. Beverly Hills & London –p.193-2.Katz, E. (1959). Mass Communication Research and the Study ofPopular Culture: An Editorial note on a Possible Future forthis Journal.Kumar, Anil & Kumar, R. (2013). “Uses of Sociall NETWORKING sites:A Study of Maharishi Dayanad University, Rohtak, India”.Library Philisophy and Paractice (e-journal). Paper 1000.Li, C. &Bernoff, J. (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a WorldTransformed by Social Technologies, Harvard Business Press,Boston, MA, 2008.Liccardi, I., Ounnas, A. Pau, R., Massey E. Kinnunen, P., Lewtwaite, S.,Midy, A. &Skar, C. (2007). The Role of Social Networks inStudents’ Learning Experiences. ACM SISCSE Bull 39(4), 224-237.Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J. & Hooley, T. (2209). Facebook, SocialInteraction and Informal Learning at University. It is more forSocialising and Talking to Friends about Work than for ActuallyDoing Work.” Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155Merchant, S. R. (2014). Internet Users. Dailytimes.com.pkMetzger, M.J. &Flanagin, A. J. (1998). Audience Orientations towardsNew Media. Communication Research Reports, 19(24), 338-51.Neuman, W. R. (1991). The Future of the Mass Audience. New York:Cambridge university press.Papacharissi, Z. & Rubin, A.M. (2000). Precdictors of Internet Use.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 175-96.Park, N., Kee, K. F. & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in socialnetworking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratificationsand social outcomes. Cyber Psychology& Behavior, 12(6), 729-733.Perse, E. M. (1998). Implications of Cognitive and Affectiveinvolvement for Channel Changing. Journal of Communication.Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The Collapse and Revival ofAmerican Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Rubin, A.M. (1994), Media uses and Effects: A Uses and GraticationsPerspective. In Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds). Media Effects:Advances in Theory and Research,9, 417-36. Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Ruslan, N. & Dhaha, I.S.Y.(2012). Somalia Students’ adoption of socialmedia to raise awareness about famine in Somalia: APreliminary Study. Paper Presente at conference on media andsociety, 24-26 September, 2012 at Sarawak, malaysia.Saleem, N., Malik, Q., Ali, A. &Hanan, A. (n.d). Influence of SocialNetworking Sites on Interaction Patterns of Youth: APakistan Case. Pakistan Vision, 15(1).Severin, W. J. &Tenkard, J. W. (2001). Uses of the Media: InCommunication Theories. New York: Longman, 293-03.Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring Students’ education-relateduse of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2).Selwyn, N. (2012). Social Media in Higher Education. The Europa Worldof Learning, 2012.Shah, D.V.,Cho,J., Eveland, W.P.Jr. &Kwak,N. (2005). Information andExpression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet effects on civicparticipation. Communication Research, 32, 531-565.Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M.R., Hwang, H., Lee, N., Scholl,R. M. &Mcleod, D.M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messagingand participation: Extending the Communication mediation model. Journal of Communication,57,676-03.Sheikh, I., Dhaha, Y., Igale, A.B. (2013). Facebook Use among SomaliYouth: A Test of Uses and Gratifications Approach. InternationalJournal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(3).Singh, H. & Kumar, A. (2013). Use of social networking sites (SNSs) bythe research scholars of Punjab University, Chandigarh: A study.58th International Conference on Next Generation Libraries: NewInsights and Universal Access to Knowledge, 682-91.Thelwall, M. (2009). Social Netwroking Sites: Uses and Uses.Zelkowitz(Ed), Advances in Computers 76. Amsterdam: Elsevier(pp.19-3).Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosureregulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science,Technology and Society, 28(1), 20-36.Vraga, E.K., Borah, P. & Shah, D.V. (2013). A New space for PoliticalBehavior. Political Social networking and its DemocraticConsequences. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 19(3)Valentine, A. (2011). Use sand Gratifications of Facebook Members 35years and old. Master Thesis. Pro Quest dissertations and thesesdatabase.Wimmer, D. R. & Dominick, R. J. (2003). Mass media research: AnIntroduction. 7thed. California: Wadsworth PublishingCompany.Wiley, C. &Sission, M. (2006). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The useof Facebook by students and employers. Paper presented at theSothwestern Ohio Concil for Higher Education Special TopicsForum, Dayton, OH.Zuckerberg, M. (2014). Our Commitment to the Facebook Community.Facebook.com. Retrieved December, 24, 2014.

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Institute of Communication Studies
University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore - 54590, Pakistan.

E-Mail : ed.jms.ics@gmail.com

Phone No. : 92-42-99231225