Impact of authentic learning on academic intrinsic motivation in studying General Science at elementary education level

Abstract

Adak, S. (2017). Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level. Educational research and reviews vol 12(22), pp 1074-1079

Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in science education, 32, 393-410

Avraamidou, L. (2012), “Prospective elementary teachers’ science teaching orientations and experiences that impacted their development”, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 35 No. 10, pp. 1698-1724

Ayla C.D. ( 2016). Student motivation in constructivist learning environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 12 (2)

Becker K, & Maunsaiyat S (2004). A comparison of students’ achievement and attitudes between constructivist and traditional classroom environments in Thailand vocational electronics programs. Journal of Vocational Educational Research, 29(2):133-153.

Bennett, L.M., & Gadlin, H. (2012).  Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice. Journal of investigative medicine

Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implication for science pedagogy: A literature review. International journal of environmental and science education. Vol 3 (4), 193-206

Carlson, A. (2002). Authentic learning: What does it really mean? Western Washington University

De Kock, A., Sleegers, P. and Voeen, M.J.M. (2014), “Learning and classification of learning environments in secondary education”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 74 No. 2, pp. 141-170

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Simon & Schuster

Dogra, B. (2010). Constructivist classroom activities for Biology leaning. Journal of Indian education, Vol 2(3).

Etuk, E. ( 2014) Creativityt: Revealing the truth about human mature. Sarasota: First Edition Design Publishing

Gibson .L.H.  , & Chase. C (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry‐based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science. Science education 86(5)

Hellgren. M., & Lindberg, S. (2017). Motivating students with authentic science experiences: changes in motivation for school science. Research in science and technological education. Vol 35(4).

Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Research On-line, Faculty of Education- papers (Archive)

Jones, F., & Harris, S. (2012). Benefits and drawbacks of using multiple instructors to teach single courses. College teaching (60), 132-139

Kim, J.S. (2005).The Effects of a Constructivist Teaching Approach on Student Academic Achievement, Self-Concept, and Learning Strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol 6(1) p7-19

Kohn, A. (1999). The schools our children deserve: Moving beyond traditional classrooms and tougher standards. New York: First Houghton Mifflin

Lombardi, M.M. (2007). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview (Boulder, Co: Edu cause Learning Initiative

Marko, R., Danijela, M. (2015). Relations between students’ motivation and perceptions of the learning environment. CEPS Journal 5(2)

Mayo, J. A. (2010).  Constructing undergraduate psychology curricula: Promoting authentic learning and assessment in the teaching of psychology.  Washington, DC:  American Psychological Association.

Meyers, N. M. & Nutty, D. D. (2009).  How to use (five) curriculum design principles to align authentic learning environments, assessment, students’ approaches to thinking and learning outcomes.  Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 565-577.

Miheso OMK (2002). The relationship between interactive teaching and the acquisition of high order thinking skills in mathematics classrooms: The Kenyan experience. African journal of educational studies 1(1):73-79.

Monica, E. A., & Olatubosun, O. (2013). Effects of scaffolding strategy on learners’ academic achievement in integrated science at the junior secondary school level. European scientific journal, 9 (19)

Obiekwe CL (2008). Effect of constructivists’ instructional approach on students’ achievement and interest in basic ecological concepts in biology (Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, University of Nigeria).

Qarareh A (2016). The Effect of using the constructivist learning model in teaching science on the achievement and scientific thinking of 8^th grade students. International Educational Studies 9(7):178.

Rae, A., & Cochrane, D. (2008). Listening to Students: How to make written assessment feedback useful. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 217- 230.

Rule, A.C. (2006). Editorial: The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1-10. Retrieved from Directory of Open Access Journals database

Schoen, L.T. (2008). Constructing high quality learning environments for twenty-first century learners: Sociocultural constructionist perspective

Stein,S. J., Isaacs, G. & Andrews, T.  (2004). Incorporating authentic learning experiences within a university course.  Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 239-258.

Steven, B. C., Haynes, C.J., & Stofer, A. K. (2015). A measure of students’ motivation to learn science through agricultural STEM emphasis. Journal of agricultural education 56(4)

Suttakun, L., Yutakom, N., Vajarasathira, B. A. (2011). A case study of understanding of the nature of science by elementary teachers and their teaching practices. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 32(3): 458–469.  

Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L. (2000). Using multivariate statistics (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3-21). Washington: AAAS Press.

Vatterott, C. (2015). Rethinking grading: Meaning assessment for standards-based learning. (p. 26-40). Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological process. London: Harvard University Press.