Journal of Elementary Education, Vol 30, No 2 (2020)

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large

A Comparison of Expert vs. Novice Delivery of STEAM-based Instruction on the Academic Achievement of Kindergarten Students

Sandy White Watson, Brenda G. Weiser, Jeremy Dean Unruh

Abstract


In an earlier research project (2014-2015) a university in the southcentral US in collaboration with a local Independent School District (ISD) configured a Curriculum Design Team who designed, developed, and reviewed a STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics with integrated arts) based multimodal curriculum. The curriculum was developed on the foundation of social constructivist pedagogical strategies and science and engineering processes and sought to explore the curriculum impact on underserved kindergarten students’ school academic achievement and readiness, inclusive of levels of literacy learning, cognitive development, academic achievement, and consequently, social/behavioral performance. The current comparative, case study examined the effects of the aforementioned STEAM-based integrated hands-on science activities, and on participating underserved kindergarten students’ academic achievement in science content from the context of teacher expertise (expert vs. novice). Two science lessons with the same content were utilized as the reference point for comparison to reveal the science academic achievement of students when delivered by an expert teacher versus a novice teacher. Additionally, the researchers examined how hands-on science activities affected the participating expert and novice teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and practices regarding the inclusion of science in the kindergarten classroom.

References


Almarza, G. (1996). Student foreign language teachers’ knowledge growth. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.). Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 50-78). Cambridge University Press.

American Forest Foundation (2013). Project Learning Tree Environmental Education Guide Pre-K-8. Washington DC: American Forest Foundation.

Barmald, R., Hardman, F., & Leat, D. (1995). Initial teacher trainees and their views of teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1). 23-31. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)E0009-T

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Binnie-Smith, D. (1996). Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 197-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brandwein, P. (1995). Science talent in the young expressed within ecologies of achievement (RBDM 9510). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center of the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.

Breen, M. (1991). Understanding the language teacher. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L.

Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith, & M. Swain, (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 213-233). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Callahan, M., & Oakes, L. (1992). Preschoolers’ questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7(2), 213-233. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(92)90012-g

Clancey, W. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chase, W. & Simon, H. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp.215-281). New York: Academic Press.

Chatterji, M. (2004). Evidence on “What Works”: an argument for extended-term mixed-method (ETMM) evaluation designs. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 14-24. doi:10.3102/0013189X034005014

Clancey, W. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representation. Cambridge, U.K;: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, M., Kahn,D., & Steeves, R. (2000). Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research: A Practical Guide for Nurse Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cotabish, A., Dailey, D., Robinson, A., & Hughes, A. (2013). The effects of a STEM intervention on elementary students’ science knowledge and skills: The effects of a STEM intervention. School Science and Mathematics, 113(5), 215-226. doi:10.1111/ssm.12023

Delaney, M. (2014). Schools shift from STEM to STEAM. EdTech, 1-4. Retrieved from http://www.edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2014/04/schools-shift-stem-steam

Dewey, J. (1916).  Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.

Dinour, L., Kwan, A., & Freudenberg, N. (2017). Use of comparative case study methodology for US public health policy analysis: A review. Journal of Public Health and Managing Practice, 23(1), 81-89. doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000000406

Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Eggers, T. (2007). Hands-on science for young children. Early childhood News. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodnews.com/earlychildhood/article view.aspx?ArticleID=431

Fosnot, C. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.

Gatbonton, E. (1999). Investigating experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 35-50. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00004

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Co.

Glaser, R., & Chi, M.  (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv-xxviii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldstein, D. (2005). Elementary science: Left behind? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 185-187. doi:10.1007/s10972-005-4859-8

Growing up WILD: exploring nature with young children. (2009). Houston, TX: Council for Environmental Education.

Haney, J. & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers' beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science Education, 86(6), 802;783;-802. doi:10.1002/sce.10038

Happo, I. , Maatta, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2013). How do early childhood education teachers perceive their expertise? A qualitative study of child care providers in Lapland, Finland. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 273-281. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0551-8

Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2016). Innovating with STEAM in middle school classrooms: Remixing education. On the Horizon, 24(3), 190-204. doi: 10.1108/OTH-03-2016-0008.

Hyunju Park, H., Soo-Yong, C., Jaeho, S., Hyesook, H., & Yoon Su, B. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM Education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1739-1753. doi:10.12973/Eurasia.2016.1531a

Johnson, K. (1992). The Relationship between Teachers Beliefs and Practices during Literacy Instruction for Non-Native Speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(1), 83-108. doi:10.1080/10862969209547763

Johnston, B. & Goettsch, K. (2000).  In Search of the Knowledge Base of Language Teaching: Explanations by Experienced Teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3), 437-468. doi:10.3138/cmlr.56.3.437

Johnson, C., Kahle, J., and Fargo, J. (2006). Effective teaching results in increased science achievement for all students. Science Education, 91(3), 371-383. doi:10.1002/sce.20195

Kang, M., Park, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, Y. (2012). Learning outcomes of the teacher training program for STEAM education. The Korean Journal of the Learning Sciences. (7)2, 18-28. Retrieved from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE02238785

Keely, P. (2009). Elementary science education in the K-12 system. Elementary science education in the K-12 system. (guest editorial). Science and Children, 46(9), 8-9.

Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understanding the lives: From career stories to teachers professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5-6), 443-456. doi:10.1016/0742-051x(93)90029-g

Kim, Kyung-Ran (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and practices survey: Operationalizing the 1997 NAEYC guidelines. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA.

Li, Y., Huang, Z., Jiang, M., & Chang, T. W. (2016). The effect on pupils’ science performance and problem-solving ability through lego: An engineering design-based modeling approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 143-156.

Lott, K., Wallin, M., Roghaar, D., and Price, T. (2013). Engineering encounters: Catch me if you can. Science and Children, 51(4), 65-69. doi:10.2505/4/sc13_051_04_65

MacDonald, A., Huser, C., Sikder, S. & Danaia, L. (2019). Effective early childhood STEM education: Findings from the Little Scientists Evaluation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 353-363. doi: 10.1007/s10643-019-01004-9

Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Masata, D. (2014). Understanding the STEM skills gap. STEM Education News. Retrieved from http://www.educationandcareernews.com

Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach (First ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers' conceptions of learners' prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970-983. doi:10.1002/sce.20006

Michaels, S., Shouse, A., & Schweingruber, H. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington DC: The National Academy Press.

Moonaw, S., & Davis, J. (2010). STEM comes to preschool. YC Young Children, 65(5), 12-18.

Nadelson, L.S. (2013). Who is watching and who is playing: Parental engagement with children at a hands-on science center. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(6), 478-484. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.833010

Nadelson, L.S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168. doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.667014

NAEYC (1997). Guidelines for the preparation of early childhood professionals. Washington DC: Author.

National Science Board (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. (NSB Publication No. NSB-10-33). Arlington, VA. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2010/nsb1033.pdf

NSTA position statement: Early childhood science education. (2014). Science and Children, 51(7), 10-12.

Parette, H., Quesenberry, A., & Blum, C. (2010). Missing the boat with technology usage in early childhood settings: A 21st century view of developmentally appropriate practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 335-343.

Peterson, P. & Comeaux, M. (1987). Teachers schemata for classroom events: The mental scaffolding of teachers thinking during classroom instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 319-331. doi:10.1016/0742-051x(87)90024-2

Piaget, J., & Cook, M. T. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press.

Porter, A. (1997). Comparative experiments in educational research. In Jaeger, R. (Eds.), Complementary methods for research in education (2nd ed.), (pp.523-547). Washington D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

Pratt, H. (2007). Science education’s “overlooked ingredient”. Why the path to global competitiveness begins in elementary school. Education Week, 27(7).  Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/10/10/07pratt.h27.html

Quigley, C., Herro, D. & Jamil, F. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices: Developing a conceptual model. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 1-12. doi:10.1111/ssm.12201

Rich, Y., & Almozlino, M. (1999). Educational goal preferences among novice and veteran teachers of sciences and humanities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(6), 613-629. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(99)00010-4

Richards, J., Li, B. & Tang, A. (1998). Exploring pedagogical reasoning beliefs. In J.C. Richards (Ed.), Beyond training. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, A., Dailey, D., Hughes, G. & Cotabish, A. (2014). The effects of a science-focused STEM intervention on gifted elementary students’ science knowledge and skills. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 189-213. doi:10.1177/1932202X14533799

Selinger, E., & Crease, R. (Eds.). (2006). The Philosophy of Expertise. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Simoncini, K., & Lasen, M. (2018). Ideas about STEM among Australian early childhood professionals: How important is STEM in early childhood education? International Journal of Early Childhood, 50, 353-369. Doi: 10.1007/s13158-018-0229-5

Sing, C. (2010). Teachers' epistemic beliefs and their pedagogical beliefs: A qualitative case study among Singaporean teachers in the context of ICT-supported reforms. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4). 128-139.

Taylor, S. & Sobel, D. (2001). Addressing the discontinuity of students’ and teachers’ diversity: a preliminary study of preservice teachers’ beliefs and perceived skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 487-503. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00008-7

Tippett, C.D. & Milford, T. M. (2017). Findings from a pre-kindergarten classroom: Making the case for STEM in early childhood education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15. doi: 10.1007/s10763-9812-8

Trundle, K.C. (2010). Teaching science during the early childhood years. National Geographic.

Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tsui, A. (2005). Expertise in teaching: Perspectives and issues. In Johnson, K. (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 167-189). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tsui, A. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 15(4), 421-439. doi:10.1080/13540600903057179

Verloop, N., Van Driel, J. & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441-461. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4

Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Williams, L. (2013). Should STEM become STEAM? District Administration, 49(2), pp. 22. Retrieved from https://www.districtadministration.com/article/should-stem-become-steam

Wolff, C.E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, P. (2015). Keeping an eye on learning: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 68-85. doi:10.1177/0022487114549810

Wolff, C.E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodska, H., & Boshuizen, P. (2016). Teacher vision: expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instructional Science, 44, 243-265. doi: 10.1007/s11251-016-9367-z

Wood, E., & Bennet, N. (2000). Changing theories, changing practice: exploring early childhood teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 635-647. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00011-1

Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.