Journal of Elementary Education, Vol 33, No 1 (2023)

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large

A naturalistic study of Ontario elementary recess in Ontario schools

Thomas Ryan

Abstract


The commitment of this Ontario (Canada) naturalistic observation study, to observe in a natural setting, the actions of elementary level students during recesses was both important and revealing. Three different students were observed each recess and the recorded behaviors appeared within 20-minute recess breaks. Recess, an informal period where students at the elementary level in grades kindergarten through eight could be observed playing, communicating or being inactive, proved surprising. 432 (18 observations per session x 12 sessions x 2 schools) direct observations led to conclusions that recess was a time to communicate with others while moving in various physical ways that revealed distinct patterns of play (games), walking, standing (idleness), individuality and group cohesion. Generally, students were engaged in play that was informal, spontaneous, and active.


References


Adams, C. (2017). Recess makes kids smarter. Scholastic Teacher Incorporating Instructor.                https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teaching-content/recess- makes-kids-smarter/

Amato, P. R. (1989). Who cares for children in public places? Naturalistic observation of male and female caretakers. Journal of Marriage & Family, 51(4), 981-990.

Castelli, D. M., Glowacki, E., Barcelona, J. M., Calvert, H. B., & Hwang, J. (2015). Active education: growing evidence on physical activity and academic performance. Active Living Research. http://activelivingresearch.org/ActiveEducationBrief

Chang, R., & Coward, F. L. (2015). More recess, time, please! Kappan, 14-17.        http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0031721715614822?journalCode=pdka

Chen, G. (2017). Who killed recess? The movement to resuscitate recess. Public School Review.      https://www.publicschoolreview.com/blog/who-killed-recess-the- movement-to-resuscitate-recess

Chen, S., & Wang, L. (2021). Naturalistic observation: Social appearance anxiety among high school students in China. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 4,(9), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040912.

Coplan, R. J., Ooi, L. L., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2015). Naturalistic observations of schoolyard social participation. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5/6), 628-650. doi:10.1177/0272431614523134

Creswell, J.W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.  

DiMercurio, A., Connell, J.P., Clark, M., & Corbetta, D. (2018). A naturalistic observation of spontaneous touches to the body and environment in the first 2 months of life. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2613.  10.3389/Fpsyg.2018.02613

Gallagher-Mackay, K., Corso, C., & Shubat, T. (2021). Schoolyards count: How Ontario’s schoolyards measure up for health, physical activity, and environmental learning. Toronto: OPHEA.

Ginsberg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119, 182-191. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-             2697

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.

Goldstein J. (2012). Play in children’s development, health, and well-being. Toy Industries of Europe. www.ornes.nl/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Play-in-children-s- development-        health-and-well-being-feb-2012.pdf

Government of Canada. (2017b). Panel on Research Ethics. Tri-Council Policy Statement – 10.3.http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policypolitique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/chapter10-chapitre10/

Government of Canada. (2017a). Panel on Research Ethics. Tri-Council Policy Statement – Chapter 2.4. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/chapter2-chapitre2/

Government of Canada. (2022). Panel on Research Ethics. TCPS 2 - Chapter 2 https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/tcps2-eptc2_chapter2-chapitre2.html#ch2_en_a2.3

Grady, J. S., Ale, C. M., & Morris, T. L. (2012). A naturalistic observation of social behaviours during preschool drop-off. Early Child Development & Care, 182(12), 1683-1694. doi:10.1080/03004430.2011.649266

Hayes, K. (2021). School recess and changes to children's play opportunities in New York city. CUNY Academic Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4175

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Marcella, J., & Howes, C. (2015). Using naturalistic observation to study children's engagement within early childhood classrooms. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in early childhood education: Review of research methodologies (2, pp. 25-53). Information Age Publishing.

Near North District School Board. (2018). School handbook / code of conduct. www-mtd.nearnorthschools.ca

O’Connor, S. (2017). The secret power of play. TIME Health. http://time.com/4928925/secret-power-play

 

Ontario Education Act (1990). Operation of school.      https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900298

 

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2019). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8: Health and Physical       Education. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/2019-health-physical-education-grades-1to8.pdf

 

Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (OPHEA). (2019). Safety in physical activity rooms. https://safety.ophea.net/tools-resources/safety-activity-rooms

 

Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (OPHEA). (2019). Ontario physical activity safety standards in education. https://safety.ophea.net

 

Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (OPHEA). (2019). A safe place to grow, learn, and play. https://www.ophea.net/article/safe-space-play-learn-grow#.Yh5OeBPMLX0

 

Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (OPHEA). (2016). May healthy school feature. https://www.ophea.net/blog/may-healthy-school-feature#.YjtdEzfMLX1

 

Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (OPHEA). (2021). COVID-19 support resources. https://www.ophea.net/healthy-schools-certification/covid-19-support-resources

 

Pellegrini, A. D. (2008). The recess debate: A disjuncture between educational policy and

scientific research. American Journal of Play, 1(2), 181-191.

 

Petrey, E. (2016, November 28). Why play is essential for the classroom [Web log post].   http://inservice.ascd.org/why-play-is-essential-for-the-classroom

 

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

 

Ramstetter, C., & Murray, R. (2017). Time to play: Recognizing the benefits of recess. American Educator, 42(4), 34-37. 106

 

Ren, J. Y., & Langhout, R. D. (2010). A recess evaluation with the players: Taking steps

 toward participatory action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1-2), 12

 

Sohn, E. (2015). Recess: It’s important. Does your child get enough of it? The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/recess-its- important-does-your-child-get-enough-of-it/2015/11/09/ab610866-8180-11e5-9afb-        0c971f713d0c_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.08a5a2c52e70

 

Vlachou, M., Andreou, E., & Botsoglou, K. (2013). Bully/Victim problems among preschool children: Naturalistic observations in the classroom and on the playground. International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 2077-93.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.