Effect of Cooperative Learning on English Reading Skill at Elementary Level in the Subject of English
Abstract
Cooperative learning strategies are used for developing English reading comprehension among students in classroom situation such as jigsaw, STAD and CIRC. By using strategies of cooperative learning students can comprehend ideas easily in learning process. Reading skill is important for using and understanding English language. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of cooperative learning on achievement, English reading of the Grade 7th students. Total number of students were 64 in both sections who were studying in Grade 7th in Govt Girls high School Faizpure, Sheikhupura. It was a Quasi-Experimental study with a Non-equivalent control group, pre-test and post-test design. By using the procedure of tossing experimental and control groups were selected randomly. Experimental group was taught by using strategies of cooperative learning such as STAD and Jigsaw. Researcher taught the control group by using grammar translation method. Researcher put her best efforts for developing questionnaire with the help of text book and experts who confirmed validity of instrument. Data was analyzed through 21-version of SPSS, comparison of pre-test and post-test was examined to know mean score of students who were taught through cooperative learning and grammar translation method. Hence, it is concluded that STAD and Jigsaw strategies of cooperative learning has significant effect on English reading comprehension of the Grade 7th students. The findings of study and recommendations were described to improve students' reading skill by using cooperative learning techniques in English classroom.
References
Al Odwan, T. A. (2012). The effect of the directed reading thinking activity through cooperative learning on English secondary stage students’ reading comprehension in Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(16), 138-151.
Barrot, J. S. (2016). ESL Learners’ Use of Reading Strategies Across Different Text Types. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5), 883-892.
Bolukbas, F., Keskin, F., & Polat, M. (2011). The effectiveness of cooperative learning in the reading comprehension skills in Turkish as a foreign language. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 330-335.
Bloom, B. S. (1979). Human characteristics and school learning. Ankara: MilliEgitim Publications.
Bryson, F. K. (2003). An examination of two methods of delivering writing instruction to fourth grade students. Texas Woman’s University, Texas.
Coleman, H. (2011). Teaching and Learning in Pakistan: The Role of Language in Education. London: Bloomsbury.
Colorin, C. (2007). Cooperative learning strategies. Washington: Reading Rockets.
Derakhshan, A., & Nazari, H. (2015). The implications of reading strategies in EFL/ESL contexts. International Journal of Social Science and Education, 5(3), 431-436.
Endeshaw, A. D. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on students’ EFL reading comprehension: Meshentie grade nine high school students in focus. Education Journal, 4(5), 222-231.
Fekri, N. (2016). Investigating the effect of cooperative learning and competitive learning strategies on the English vocabulary development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 6-12.
Gillies, R. (2011). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research,39(1), 35-49.
Hall, L, A. (2016). The role of identity in reading comprehension development, Reading & Writing Quarterly,23(1),56-80. 1 1 1
Haupt, J. (2015). The Use of a Computer-based Reading Rate Development Program on Pre-university Intermediate Level ESL Learners’ Reading Speeds. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 15(1), 1-14.
Marzbana, A., & Alinejadb, F. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension of iranian EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(23), 3744 – 3748.
Moryadee, W. (2001). Effects of cooperative learning using student teams-achievement divisions technique on self-efficacy and English learning achievement of prathomsuksa five students. University of Chulalongkorn.
Mustafa, F., & Samad, A. M. N. (2015). Cooperative[i1] [i2] integrated reading and composition technique for improving content and organization in writing, Studies In English Language And Education, 2(1), 29-44.
Ning, H. (2011). Adapting cooperative learning in tertiary ELT. English Language Teaching Journal, 65(1), 60-70.
Siegel, C. (2005). Implementing a research-based model of cooperative learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 1-15.
Soares, L. B., & Wood, K. (2010). A critical literacy perspective for teaching and learning social studies. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 486-494.
Stevens, R. J (2003). Student team reading and writing: a cooperative learning approach to middle school literacy instruction. Education Research Evaluation, 9(2), 137-160.
Taguchi, E., Melhem, L., & Kawaguchi, T. (2016). Assisted reading: A flexible approach to L2 reading fluency building. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 16(1), 106-118.
Tsay, M., & Miranda, M. (2012). A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 78-89.
Yalcin, A. (2002). Turkish methods of teaching. N Y: Akcag Publications.
Zarrabi, F. (2016). A study on cooperative language learning: the impact of CLL approach on English language proficiency of EFL learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 1(2), 119-132.
[i1]I have put references
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.